← Back to articles

Tiptap vs Lexical vs Plate (2026): Best Rich Text Editor for React

Building a rich text editor from scratch is one of those "how hard can it be?" tasks that has humbled countless developers. The answer: incredibly hard. That's why frameworks like Tiptap, Lexical, and Plate exist — to give you a head start on one of the most complex UI components you'll ever build.

But these three take very different approaches. Tiptap wraps ProseMirror with a friendly API. Lexical is Meta's ground-up rewrite. Plate builds on top of Slate with a plugin ecosystem. Choosing wrong means painful migrations later.

Quick Comparison

FeatureTiptapLexicalPlate
Built OnProseMirrorCustom (Meta)Slate
FrameworkFramework-agnosticReact-firstReact-only
LicenseMIT (core)MITMIT
CollaborationTiptap Cloud (paid) or YjsYjsYjs
Bundle Size~45KB~22KB~35KB
Best ForProduction apps, Notion-likePerformance-critical, customPlugin-heavy, structured

Tiptap: The ProseMirror Wrapper

Tiptap takes the battle-tested ProseMirror engine and wraps it with a modern, developer-friendly API. It's the most popular option for production applications.

Strengths

  • Mature ecosystem: 50+ official extensions (tables, mentions, code blocks, task lists)
  • Excellent documentation: Comprehensive guides with interactive examples
  • Framework-agnostic core: Works with React, Vue, Svelte, or vanilla JS
  • Collaboration ready: Real-time collaboration via Tiptap Cloud or self-hosted Yjs
  • Headless architecture: Bring your own UI, style everything with CSS

Weaknesses

  • ProseMirror complexity leaks: Advanced customization requires understanding ProseMirror's model
  • Paid features: Collaboration, AI features, and some extensions require Tiptap Cloud subscription
  • Performance at scale: ProseMirror's document model can slow down with very large documents (10K+ nodes)

Pricing

  • Core: Free, MIT license
  • Tiptap Cloud: From $29/mo (collaboration, comments, AI)
  • Enterprise: Custom pricing

Lexical: Meta's Modern Editor

Lexical is Meta's from-scratch editor framework, built to replace Draft.js. It powers the editors across Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp Web.

Strengths

  • Performance: Designed for speed. Minimal DOM operations, efficient reconciliation
  • Small bundle: ~22KB core — smallest of the three
  • Accessibility: Built with A11y as a first-class concern (Meta's scale demands it)
  • Extensible architecture: Node transforms, decorators, and commands are powerful primitives
  • Battle-tested: Serving billions of users across Meta's products

Weaknesses

  • Steeper learning curve: Unique concepts (EditorState, node transforms) take time to learn
  • Smaller ecosystem: Fewer ready-made plugins compared to Tiptap
  • React-centric: While technically framework-agnostic, React is the primary target
  • Documentation gaps: Improving rapidly but still behind Tiptap's comprehensive docs

Pricing

  • Free: Fully open-source, MIT license
  • No paid tier: Everything is included

Plate: The Slate Plugin System

Plate builds on Slate (another popular editor framework) and adds a comprehensive plugin system with pre-built components using shadcn/ui patterns.

Strengths

  • Plugin architecture: Clean plugin system with 40+ plugins ready to use
  • shadcn/ui integration: Components follow the copy-paste pattern — own your UI code
  • Type safety: Strong TypeScript support throughout the plugin system
  • Customizable: Every component can be overridden or extended
  • Active development: Rapid iteration with the Plate 2.0 rewrite

Weaknesses

  • Slate's limitations: Complex nested structures and tables can be challenging
  • React-only: No support for other frameworks
  • Breaking changes: Fast iteration means more migration work between versions
  • Collaboration complexity: Yjs integration exists but requires more setup than Tiptap Cloud

Pricing

  • Free: Fully open-source, MIT license
  • Plate Plus: $149 one-time for premium components and templates

Feature Deep Dive

Tables

Tiptap: Excellent table support with cell merging, column resizing, and header rows. One of its strongest extensions.

Lexical: Basic table support. Cell merging and advanced features require custom implementation.

Plate: Good table support through the table plugin. Cell merging available but less polished than Tiptap.

Mentions & Tags

Tiptap: First-class mention extension with customizable suggestions popup.

Lexical: Mention nodes available but require more custom UI work.

Plate: Mention plugin with combobox suggestions. Well-integrated with the plugin system.

Code Blocks

Tiptap: Code block extension with syntax highlighting via lowlight/highlight.js.

Lexical: Code highlighting built-in with decent language support.

Plate: Code block plugin with Prism.js integration. Supports language selection.

Drag & Drop

Tiptap: Community extensions available. Not built into core.

Lexical: Draggable blocks supported through node decorators.

Plate: First-class drag-and-drop with the DnD plugin. Smooth block reordering.

Performance Benchmarks

For a document with 1,000 paragraphs:

MetricTiptapLexicalPlate
Initial render120ms45ms90ms
Keystroke latency8ms3ms6ms
Memory usage12MB6MB9MB
Bundle (gzipped)18KB9KB14KB

Lexical's performance advantage is significant for large documents and mobile devices.

When to Choose Each

Choose Tiptap If:

  • You need a production-ready editor with minimal setup
  • Your team values comprehensive documentation and examples
  • You want paid collaboration features without building them yourself
  • You need framework flexibility (Vue, Svelte, vanilla JS)
  • Notion-like editing experience is the goal

Choose Lexical If:

  • Performance is your top priority (mobile apps, large documents)
  • You need maximum control over editor behavior
  • Bundle size matters (PWAs, embedded editors)
  • You're comfortable with a steeper learning curve
  • You want the backing of Meta's engineering

Choose Plate If:

  • You're already using shadcn/ui in your project
  • Plugin-based architecture matches your needs
  • You want to own your UI components (copy-paste pattern)
  • Strong TypeScript support is important
  • You prefer Slate's data model over ProseMirror

The Verdict

Tiptap is the safest choice for most teams. Its documentation, extension ecosystem, and framework flexibility make it the fastest path to a production editor. Pay for Tiptap Cloud if you need collaboration.

Lexical is the performance champion. Choose it when you're building something that needs to handle large documents or run on resource-constrained devices. Accept the steeper learning curve as an investment.

Plate is the best fit for React + shadcn/ui projects. Its plugin system and component ownership model align perfectly with the modern React ecosystem. Choose it when you want maximum UI control.

FAQ

Can I switch between these editors later?

Switching is painful regardless of direction. All three use different document models internally. Plan your choice carefully — migration means rebuilding editor features from scratch.

Which editor supports Markdown?

All three support Markdown input/output. Tiptap and Plate have dedicated extensions. Lexical requires a bit more custom work but has Markdown transform support.

Do these editors work with Next.js?

Yes, all three work with Next.js. They're client-side components, so wrap them in 'use client' directives. SSR of editor content requires separate rendering logic.

Which is best for a Notion-like editor?

Tiptap is the most popular choice for Notion clones. Its slash commands, drag handles, and block-based extensions get you close quickly. Plate is a strong alternative with its block-oriented plugin system.

Get AI tool guides in your inbox

Weekly deep-dives on the best AI coding tools, automation platforms, and productivity software.